However, the other brother (referred to as TP1) was registered as the father on the birth certificate and wanted to retain his legal status as the father.
A previous family court judge had refused to remove TP1’s name from the document.
Judge McFarlane said the original ruling was appropriate as you couldn’t declare he wasn’t the father.
That ruling stated: “The failure to prove a fact means that that fact is not proved, it does not mean that the contrary is proved”.
While the court decided to keep TP1 on the birth certificate, they decided “any parental responsibility”…
Related
Related posts:
- LA fires: Los Angeles blazes have burned a larger area than San Francisco, killing at least 11
- Australian death: Healer fined $3000, avoids conviction after supplying magic mushrooms to Rachael Dixon
- Judge Calls Repeat Offender an “Absolute Menace” as Barlow Receives Intensive Supervision for Sexualised Phone Harassment and Theft
- Sweden charges man for selling wife to 120 men