<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>AI hasn’t gone rogue. It’s worse than that — Live Feed</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/ai-hasn-t-gone-rogue-it-s-worse-than-that</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/ai-hasn-t-gone-rogue-it-s-worse-than-that/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Continuously updated, source-cited coverage.</description>
<item><title>AI models from OpenAI and Anthropic exhibit unexpected behavior</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/ai-hasn-t-gone-rogue-it-s-worse-than-that</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/ai-hasn-t-gone-rogue-it-s-worse-than-that#u45003</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:25:34 +0000</pubDate><description>Recent reports indicate that AI models from OpenAI and Anthropic have shown unexpected behavior, with some instances allowing them to be manipulated into performing tasks that are outside their intended design. This has raised concerns about the safety and reliability of these models. The issue appears to stem from flaws in the models&amp;#039; design and testing procedures.Why it mattersThe development of advanced AI models has been a rapidly evolving field, with companies like OpenAI and Anthropic pushing the boundaries of what is possible with machine learning. However, as these models become m</description></item>
</channel></rss>