<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>‘An out-of-touch Silicon Valley radical’: meet Trump’s AI whisperer pushing for limited regulation — Live Feed</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/an-out-of-touch-silicon-valley-radical-meet-trump-s-ai-whisperer-pushing-for-limited-regulation</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/an-out-of-touch-silicon-valley-radical-meet-trump-s-ai-whisperer-pushing-for-limited-regulation/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Continuously updated, source-cited coverage.</description>
<item><title>David Sacks pushes for limited AI regulation in Trump administration</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/an-out-of-touch-silicon-valley-radical-meet-trump-s-ai-whisperer-pushing-for-limited-regulation</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/an-out-of-touch-silicon-valley-radical-meet-trump-s-ai-whisperer-pushing-for-limited-regulation#u80276</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:31:25 +0000</pubDate><description>Trump adviser and former AI czar David Sacks is advocating for minimal regulation of artificial intelligence, dismissing fears of an AI apocalypse as a &amp;quot;hoax.&amp;quot; Sacks attributes these concerns to a &amp;quot;fear-mongering playbook&amp;quot; and suggests that companies like OpenAI and Anthropic should simply stop or slow development if they believe their models are unsafe. His influence marks a shift toward rejecting traditional AI safety frameworks in favor of a more permissive approach to technology development.Why it mattersThe debate over AI safety centers on whether guardrails are necess</description></item>
</channel></rss>