<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Did Anthropic’s A.I. Really Make a Scientific Discovery on Its Own? — Live Feed</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/did-anthropic-s-a-i-really-make-a-scientific-discovery-on-its-own</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/did-anthropic-s-a-i-really-make-a-scientific-discovery-on-its-own/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Continuously updated, source-cited coverage.</description>
<item><title>Questions Arise Over Anthropic AI Discovery Claim</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/did-anthropic-s-a-i-really-make-a-scientific-discovery-on-its-own</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/did-anthropic-s-a-i-really-make-a-scientific-discovery-on-its-own#u97851</guid><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 02:55:20 +0000</pubDate><description>Artificial intelligence company Anthropic faces scrutiny over claims that its Claude model independently discovered a novel enzyme system with CRISPR-like repeats called ARTs. While Anthropic announced the finding as a major breakthrough from its new biology lab, outside experts and scientists have questioned whether the artificial intelligence truly made the discovery on its own. Computational biologist Mario Rodriguez Mestre stated that he and his colleagues have studied these exact enzymes for four years and regularly used Anthropic models during their research, raising doubts about whether</description></item>
</channel></rss>