<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Federal appeals court rules that states can regulate betting markets — Live Feed</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/federal-appeals-court-rules-that-states-can-regulate-betting-markets</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/federal-appeals-court-rules-that-states-can-regulate-betting-markets/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Continuously updated, source-cited coverage.</description>
<item><title>Federal appeals court rules states can regulate betting markets</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/federal-appeals-court-rules-that-states-can-regulate-betting-markets</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/federal-appeals-court-rules-that-states-can-regulate-betting-markets#u53482</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 03:15:27 +0000</pubDate><description>A federal appeals court has ruled that states have the authority to regulate prediction markets as gambling, rejecting Kalshi&amp;#039;s claim that federal commodities law preempts state oversight. The unanimous decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals prevents Kalshi from operating sports and election trading in Nevada without a state gambling license. This ruling characterizes prediction market contracts as gambling rather than swaps.Why it mattersThe decision intensifies a legal dispute over whether prediction markets are financial products regulated by Washington or state-controlled gamb</description></item>
<item><title>Ninth Circuit rules Nevada can regulate Kalshi sports contracts as gambling</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/federal-appeals-court-rules-that-states-can-regulate-betting-markets</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/federal-appeals-court-rules-that-states-can-regulate-betting-markets#u53068</guid><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 11:26:05 +0000</pubDate><description>A federal appeals court ruled on August 28 that Nevada has the authority to regulate prediction markets as gambling. The unanimous decision rejects Kalshi&amp;#039;s claim that federal commodities law preempts state oversight of its sports-event contracts. This ruling prevents the platform from operating sports and election trading in Nevada without a state gambling license. The court characterized these contracts as gambling rather than swaps, intensifying a legal dispute over whether prediction markets are financial products regulated by Washington or state-controlled gambling operations.Why it </description></item>
<item><title>9th Circuit Rules States Can Regulate Prediction Markets as Gambling</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/federal-appeals-court-rules-that-states-can-regulate-betting-markets</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/federal-appeals-court-rules-that-states-can-regulate-betting-markets#u51845</guid><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:05:22 +0000</pubDate><description>A 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel ruled that states have the authority to regulate prediction markets as gambling. The 3-0 decision prevents prediction market operator Kalshi from restarting trading on sporting and election events in Nevada without a state gambling license. The court rejected Kalshi&amp;#039;s argument that its sports-related event contracts are &amp;quot;swaps,&amp;quot; instead characterizing them as gambling under a different name. This ruling creates a circuit split with a previous Third Circuit decision, increasing the likelihood of a Supreme Court review.Why it mattersPredic</description></item>
</channel></rss>