<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>‘Freedom Fuel’ Touts Cheap Gas. A Lawsuit Says the Dealer Didn’t Pay for It. — Live Feed</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/freedom-fuel-touts-cheap-gas-a-lawsuit-says-the-dealer-didn-t-pay-for-it</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/freedom-fuel-touts-cheap-gas-a-lawsuit-says-the-dealer-didn-t-pay-for-it/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Continuously updated, source-cited coverage.</description>
<item><title>Supplier Sues KRSM Over $3.9 Million in Unpaid Freedom Fuel Deliveries</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/freedom-fuel-touts-cheap-gas-a-lawsuit-says-the-dealer-didn-t-pay-for-it</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/freedom-fuel-touts-cheap-gas-a-lawsuit-says-the-dealer-didn-t-pay-for-it#u55079</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 03:16:05 +0000</pubDate><description>Mansfield Oil filed a federal lawsuit in Pennsylvania alleging that KRSM failed to pay for fuel deliveries totaling between $3.9 million and $4 million. These deliveries supplied the Freedom Fuel Network, a discount gas chain in Pennsylvania and New Jersey that gained attention for prices significantly lower than nearby competitors. While the network received praise from Donald Trump in July for its low costs, Freedom Fuel is not a named defendant in the suit. An attorney for KRSM disputes the allegations that the company failed to pay for the fuel.Why it mattersThe dispute centers on whether </description></item>
<item><title>Lawsuit Alleges Freedom Fuel Sold Stolen Gas</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/freedom-fuel-touts-cheap-gas-a-lawsuit-says-the-dealer-didn-t-pay-for-it</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/freedom-fuel-touts-cheap-gas-a-lawsuit-says-the-dealer-didn-t-pay-for-it#u53042</guid><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:52:14 +0000</pubDate><description>A lawsuit claims the owner of Freedom Fuel gas stations failed to pay for nearly $4 million in fuel. These stations, which Donald Trump promoted for their low prices, are accused of selling stolen fuel according to a supplier. While the brand marketed cheap gas to consumers, a distributor now alleges the fuel went unpaid for. The legal action seeks to recover these losses from the dealer.Why it mattersThe controversy centers on the gap between the brand&amp;#039;s public marketing of affordability and its internal payment obligations. Donald Trump&amp;#039;s public endorsement of the stations&amp;#039; lo</description></item>
</channel></rss>