<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>How Supreme Court justices are leaning in major 401(k) case over private funds and underperformance — Live Feed</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/how-supreme-court-justices-are-leaning-in-major-401-k-case-over-private-funds-and-underperformance</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/how-supreme-court-justices-are-leaning-in-major-401-k-case-over-private-funds-and-underperformance/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Continuously updated, source-cited coverage.</description>
<item><title>Supreme Court Weighs 401(k) Case on Private Fund Underperformance</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/how-supreme-court-justices-are-leaning-in-major-401-k-case-over-private-funds-and-underperformance</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/how-supreme-court-justices-are-leaning-in-major-401-k-case-over-private-funds-and-underperformance#u122814</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 04:02:28 +0000</pubDate><description>The US Supreme Court heard arguments in Anderson v. Intel, a case that could determine whether 401(k) underperformance claims must include a &amp;quot;meaningful benchmark&amp;quot;. The case has significant implications for employers and asset managers. The justices seemed skeptical of a challenge to private equity in 401(k) plans, with some expressing concerns about comparing apples to apples in assessing investment choices. A ruling could reshape how 401(k) plans incorporate private funds.Why it mattersThe case centers on a dispute over Intel&amp;#039;s 401(k) plan, with plaintiffs arguing that the pla</description></item>
</channel></rss>