<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Judge calls $3,000 hourly rate 'patently unreasonable' as lawyer billing soars — Live Feed</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/judge-calls-3-000-hourly-rate-patently-unreasonable-as-lawyer-billing-soars</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/judge-calls-3-000-hourly-rate-patently-unreasonable-as-lawyer-billing-soars/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Continuously updated, source-cited coverage.</description>
<item><title>California Judge Caps Lawyer Hourly Rate at $1,600 in Google Privacy Case</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/judge-calls-3-000-hourly-rate-patently-unreasonable-as-lawyer-billing-soars</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/judge-calls-3-000-hourly-rate-patently-unreasonable-as-lawyer-billing-soars#u138020</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 01:35:50 +0000</pubDate><description>US District Judge Beth Labson Freeman rejected a $3,000 hourly billing rate as &amp;quot;patently unreasonable&amp;quot; in a privacy claims settlement against Google. While the judge approved over $22.6 million in legal fees from a $68 million settlement, she capped the specific attorney&amp;#039;s rate at $1,600. This ruling comes amid rising legal costs where some Biglaw partners charge $4,000 per hour. The decision highlights a judicial limit on soaring billing rates despite general market trends in corporate and class action law.Why it mattersThe ruling stems from litigation involving Google&amp;#039;s v</description></item>
</channel></rss>