<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Making AI safer is not impossible, but agreeing to do so may be — Live Feed</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/making-ai-safer-is-not-impossible-but-agreeing-to-do-so-may-be</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/making-ai-safer-is-not-impossible-but-agreeing-to-do-so-may-be/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Continuously updated, source-cited coverage.</description>
<item><title>Global Disagreement Hinders AI Safety Standards</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/making-ai-safer-is-not-impossible-but-agreeing-to-do-so-may-be</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/making-ai-safer-is-not-impossible-but-agreeing-to-do-so-may-be#u72070</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 04:21:24 +0000</pubDate><description>Technical solutions to make AI safer are feasible, but political and corporate friction prevents a global agreement. American laboratories and government authorities are currently at odds, while tensions persist between the United States and China. Trust in AI companies remains low, making a swift pause in development unlikely. Some analysts argue that companies may benefit from public fear regarding existential threats, while others suggest that firms like OpenAI and Anthropic are seeking government support to ensure they are too big to fail.Why it mattersThe debate centers on whether AI pose</description></item>
</channel></rss>