<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>No, ‘mogging’ does not signal the decline of the English language — Live Feed</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/no-mogging-does-not-signal-the-decline-of-the-english-language</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/no-mogging-does-not-signal-the-decline-of-the-english-language/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Continuously updated, source-cited coverage.</description>
<item><title>Collins Dictionary names mogging as its 2026 Word of the Year</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/no-mogging-does-not-signal-the-decline-of-the-english-language</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/no-mogging-does-not-signal-the-decline-of-the-english-language#u193436</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2026 08:35:27 +0000</pubDate><description>Collins Dictionary has chosen the term mogging as its 2026 Word of the Year, prompting discussion across media outlets regarding its definition and cultural relevance. While the selection has drawn varied commentary, including a defense in the Financial Times arguing against the idea that the term signals the decline of the English language, publications like CNN, AP News, The Telegraph, and Cleveland.com have highlighted the word&amp;#039;s emergence in public discourse. Additionally, political applications of the term have surfaced in European political commentary.Why it mattersLanguage authorit</description></item>
</channel></rss>