<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>‘P(doom)’ Is Just Vibes Masquerading as Science — Live Feed</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/p-doom-is-just-vibes-masquerading-as-science</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/p-doom-is-just-vibes-masquerading-as-science/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Continuously updated, source-cited coverage.</description>
<item><title>Debate Intensifies Over AI Existential Risk and Regulation</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/p-doom-is-just-vibes-masquerading-as-science</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/p-doom-is-just-vibes-masquerading-as-science#u73865</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 03:42:07 +0000</pubDate><description>Critics and industry leaders are clashing over the validity of AI existential risk, termed P(doom), with some dismissing it as unfounded fear. Anthony Pompliano, CEO of ProCap Financial Inc., claims AI doomers employ a fear-based playbook similar to early cryptocurrency skeptics. Meanwhile, public unease grows as Congress struggles to pass tech regulations. This tension coincides with corporate shifts, such as Alphabet reworking its AI strategy and Elon Musk allocating the majority of SpaceX&amp;#039;s $18.4 billion capex toward AI to support his goal of placing robots on the Moon.Why it mattersTh</description></item>
</channel></rss>