https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/public-say-prince-harry-and-meghan-should-pay-for-their-own-securityContinuously updated, source-cited coverage. https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/public-say-prince-harry-and-meghan-should-pay-for-their-own-securityhttps://www.live-feeds.com/feed/public-say-prince-harry-and-meghan-should-pay-for-their-own-security#u50867Fri, 28 Aug 2026 11:20:49 +0000Public opposition remains strong regarding the use of British taxpayer funds to provide security for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle following their return to Britain. The couple resigned as working royals six years ago to move to California, but their current presence in the UK has renewed arguments over state-funded protection. While the couple has sought security, former royal staff and Prime Minister Andy Burnham have previously pushed back, with Burnham characterizing the security arrangements as a private matter.Why it mattersThe dispute centers on whether individuals who voluntarily reli https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/public-say-prince-harry-and-meghan-should-pay-for-their-own-securityhttps://www.live-feeds.com/feed/public-say-prince-harry-and-meghan-should-pay-for-their-own-security#u49729Thu, 27 Aug 2026 07:40:27 +0000Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have returned to Britain six years after resigning as working royals and moving to California. Their arrival renews public debate over whether British taxpayers should fund their security. While the couple has previously sought protection, public sentiment remains largely opposed to using state funds for their safety. Prime Minister Andy Burnham previously described the security arrangements as a private matter, and former royal staff have dismissed the security requests.Why it mattersThe couple's move to California marked a formal break from royal duties. T https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/public-say-prince-harry-and-meghan-should-pay-for-their-own-securityhttps://www.live-feeds.com/feed/public-say-prince-harry-and-meghan-should-pay-for-their-own-security#u48770Wed, 26 Aug 2026 05:30:37 +0000British citizens largely oppose using public funds to provide security for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. While some support the couple's bid for protection, polls indicate a backlash against taxpayer funding. Prince Harry has privately sought answers regarding security from Mahmood, and a former Royal Family employee has dismissed his security requests as nonsense. Prime Minister Andy Burnham has characterized the couple's security arrangements as a private matter.Why it mattersThe dispute centers on whether the UK government should bear the cost of protecting the couple during the