Supreme Court ruling on Roundup points to a confusing difference between the law and science — Live Feedhttps://www.live-feeds.com/feed/supreme-court-ruling-on-roundup-points-to-a-confusing-difference-between-the-law-and-scienceContinuously updated, source-cited coverage. Supreme Court Blocks Roundup Lawsuits Over Cancer Warningshttps://www.live-feeds.com/feed/supreme-court-ruling-on-roundup-points-to-a-confusing-difference-between-the-law-and-sciencehttps://www.live-feeds.com/feed/supreme-court-ruling-on-roundup-points-to-a-confusing-difference-between-the-law-and-science#u24509Sat, 04 Jul 2026 14:06:27 +0000The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in Monsanto v. Durnell that federal pesticide law preempts state claims requiring cancer warnings on Roundup labels. This decision prevents states from requiring warnings beyond those approved by the EPA. The ruling is expected to block thousands of pending lawsuits against Bayer.What's confirmed:The Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in favor of Roundup's maker.Federal pesticide law preempts state failure-to-warn claims regarding Roundup labels.States cannot require pesticide manufacturers to add warnings beyond those approved by the EPA.The decision is expected to