<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Security Companies Trying to Get AI Agents Under Control — Live Feed</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/the-security-companies-trying-to-get-ai-agents-under-control</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/the-security-companies-trying-to-get-ai-agents-under-control/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Continuously updated, source-cited coverage.</description>
<item><title>Security Firms Tackle AI Agent Governance As New Controls Emerge</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/the-security-companies-trying-to-get-ai-agents-under-control</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/the-security-companies-trying-to-get-ai-agents-under-control#u191141</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 12:31:07 +0000</pubDate><description>Security companies and technology platforms are rushing to establish guardrails and isolation protocols for autonomous artificial intelligence agents as adoption scales across enterprises. Industry observers warn that organizations frequently grant agents high-speed operational autonomy before building the governance required to control them. To mitigate these risks, firms like Docker are pushing for strict isolation measures, while CrowdStrike has introduced an automated kill switch designed to halt rogue internal agents, block relaunches, and sever network access. Meanwhile, debates persist </description></item>
</channel></rss>