<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>US leaving oil-for-security approach, not Middle East: Envoy Tom Barrack — Live Feed</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/us-leaving-oil-for-security-approach-not-middle-east-envoy-tom-barrack</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/us-leaving-oil-for-security-approach-not-middle-east-envoy-tom-barrack/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Continuously updated, source-cited coverage.</description>
<item><title>US shifting from oil-for-security approach in Middle East</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/us-leaving-oil-for-security-approach-not-middle-east-envoy-tom-barrack</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/us-leaving-oil-for-security-approach-not-middle-east-envoy-tom-barrack#u150429</guid><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 00:56:53 +0000</pubDate><description>The United States is moving away from its traditional security-for-oil relationship with the Middle East, according to US envoy Tom Barrack. This shift marks a change in Washington&amp;#039;s role as a guarantor of security in the region. Barrack emphasized that direct US military intervention on the ground is not a viable solution, particularly in conflicts like the Saudi-Houthi war in Yemen.Why it mattersThe US has been a key player in Middle East security for decades, often intervening militarily to protect its interests and those of its allies. However, recent statements by Barrack suggest a r</description></item>
</channel></rss>