<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Warrants to Search Former Prince Andrew’s Properties Were Unlawful, Court Says — Live Feed</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/warrants-to-search-former-prince-andrew-s-properties-were-unlawful-court-says</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/warrants-to-search-former-prince-andrew-s-properties-were-unlawful-court-says/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Continuously updated, source-cited coverage.</description>
<item><title>Court Rules Search Warrants for Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Properties Unlawful</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/warrants-to-search-former-prince-andrew-s-properties-were-unlawful-court-says</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/warrants-to-search-former-prince-andrew-s-properties-were-unlawful-court-says#u133140</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 20:11:25 +0000</pubDate><description>A London judge ruled that search warrants used to raid two properties belonging to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew, were unlawful. Thames Valley Police accepted the warrants were issued on an incorrect legal basis, leading the High Court to quash them. While the warrants were overturned, UK police are maintaining their criminal investigation into his links to late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. A High Court battle continues over whether evidence seized during these raids can still be used in the criminal proceedings.Why it mattersThe raids were part of a broader investigation</description></item>
</channel></rss>