<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Warrants used to search Andrew's homes were unlawful, court says — Live Feed</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/warrants-used-to-search-andrew-s-homes-were-unlawful-court-says</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/warrants-used-to-search-andrew-s-homes-were-unlawful-court-says/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Continuously updated, source-cited coverage.</description>
<item><title>Court Rules Search Warrants Used Against Andrew Unlawful</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/warrants-used-to-search-andrew-s-homes-were-unlawful-court-says</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/warrants-used-to-search-andrew-s-homes-were-unlawful-court-says#u123760</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 11:46:36 +0000</pubDate><description>A London judge ruled that search warrants used by Thames Valley Police to raid the homes of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor earlier this year were unlawful. Justice Nicholas Hilliard identified significant errors made by the police in applying for the warrants and by the judge who granted them during an investigation linked to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Police accepted the legal errors, giving the former prince a win in his lawsuit against authorities. However, officers have retained seized material while arguing over whether they can lawfully hold it for their ongoing criminal probe.Wh</description></item>
</channel></rss>