<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>'Weird and icky': Would Australians support a smart glasses ban? — Live Feed</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/weird-and-icky-would-australians-support-a-smart-glasses-ban</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/weird-and-icky-would-australians-support-a-smart-glasses-ban/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Continuously updated, source-cited coverage.</description>
<item><title>Australian Government weighs ban on smart glasses in public buildings</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/weird-and-icky-would-australians-support-a-smart-glasses-ban</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/weird-and-icky-would-australians-support-a-smart-glasses-ban#u77875</guid><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 22:15:21 +0000</pubDate><description>The Albanese government is considering a ban on smart glasses within public offices and government buildings. This proposed restriction targets the use of the devices by public servants and visitors in official spaces. The move aims to address privacy and security concerns associated with wearable camera technology in sensitive government environments. Officials describe the potential policy as world-leading in its approach to regulating smart eyewear in the public sector.Why it mattersSmart glasses integrate cameras and microphones into eyewear, allowing users to record surroundings discreetl</description></item>
</channel></rss>