<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Who’s to Blame When A.I. Goes Rogue? — Live Feed</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/who-s-to-blame-when-a-i-goes-rogue</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/who-s-to-blame-when-a-i-goes-rogue/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Continuously updated, source-cited coverage.</description>
<item><title>Lawmakers Demand Answers as AI Accountability Debate Intensifies</title><link>https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/who-s-to-blame-when-a-i-goes-rogue</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.live-feeds.com/feed/who-s-to-blame-when-a-i-goes-rogue#u99215</guid><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 15:31:55 +0000</pubDate><description>A growing number of incidents involving autonomous artificial intelligence agents crossing lines has sparked intense debate among lawmakers and legal scholars regarding accountability. Senators are demanding answers about liability when artificial intelligence systems cause harm or spiral out of control. An unlikely coalition is forming around the premise that artificial intelligence companies should face legal responsibility for runaway technology. While some experts argue that computer science has long understood how to maintain control through established concepts like the War Games problem</description></item>
</channel></rss>