What are the best cities in the United States to live without a car

During this pandemic hitting us, some Americans bought cars for the first time to avoid using public transportation or carpooling, but not all are willing to embrace car culture.

And for those who don’t want to get behind the wheel, pedestrian accessibility and public transportation options can make a difference where they choose to live.

A new ranking of the best cities in the country to live without a vehicle includes some of the usual suspects, like San Francisco and New York, as well as a few surprises, like Providence, Rhode Island.

The 150-city assessment by LawnStarter, a lawn vehicle service company, examined 20 metrics, including pedestrian accessibility, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian safety, transit options, and gun safety.

Many of the worst places to live without a car were in the South, including the five worst places:

Shreveport, Louisiana (150); Montgomery, Alabama (149); Little Rock, Arkansas (148); Huntsville, Alabama (147); y Winston-Salem, Carolina del Norte (146).

The most walkable city is Washington, followed by Nashville, Tennessee and Omaha, Nebraska, tied for second. The least passable was Port St. Lucie, Florida.

New York has the highest proportion of residents using public transportation to get to work, but it also has the highest average commute time.

Here are the 20 best cities to live without a vehicle:

1. San Francisco

2. Portland, Oregon

3. Washington

4. Boston

5. New York

6. Honolulu

7. Oakland, California

8. Providence, Rhode Island

9. Minneapolis

10. Seattle

11. Jersey City, New Jersey

12. Salt Lake City

13. Mesa, Arizona

14. Tuscon, Arizona

See Also:  security breach (and why it is needed)

15. Madison, Wisconsin

16. Los Angeles

17. Irvine, California

18. Santa Rosa, California

19. Tempe, Arizona

20. City of Boise, Idaho

Source: LawnStarter – USA Today

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.