Federal appeals court rules that states can regulate betting markets
Attorneys representing the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and a prediction market operator urged a Manhattan federal court to halt New York State from cracking down on prediction platforms. This courtroom battle unfolds as prediction markets face mounting state-level pressures across the country, including daily penalties in Michigan over sports event contracts lacking geofences. Meanwhile, New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to resolve a circuit split regarding whether these event contracts constitute regulated gambling or financial swaps, leaving the central question of federal preemption unresolved.
What changed
Attorneys for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and a prediction market operator asked a New York federal court to block New York State from enforcing restrictions.
Live updates
-
Manhattan Federal Court Weighs New York Prediction Market Crackdown
Attorneys representing the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and a prediction market operator urged a Manhattan federal court to halt New York State from cracking down on prediction platforms. This courtroom battle unfolds as prediction markets face mounting state-level pressures across the country, including daily penalties in Michigan over sports event contracts lacking geofences. Meanwhile, New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to resolve a circuit split regarding whether these event contracts constitute regulated gambling or financial swaps, leaving the central question of federal preemption unresolved.
Why it matters
State regulators and federal entities continue to clash over the legal status of event contracts that allow users to speculate on elections and sports matches. Prediction platforms operate like regular stock exchanges where users buy and sell fixed-payout contracts, creating tension with state gambling laws. Courts are now tasked with determining whether federal commodity regulations preempt state enforcement actions.
What is confirmed
- Attorneys for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and a prediction market operator asked a New York federal court to block New York State.
- New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport petitioned the Supreme Court to resolve a circuit split over whether event contracts qualify as gambling or financial swaps.
Still unconfirmed
- Prediction markets face daily penalties in Michigan for lacking a geofence on sports event contracts.
What to watch next
- A ruling from the Manhattan federal court on New York State's prediction market crackdown.
- Supreme Court action on New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport's petition regarding event contracts.
confidence 100%Sources used for this update (9)
- jen.jiji.com — Weather, more rain in the Center-South then everything changes: what happens with the arrival of the Azores Anticyclone
- www.law.com — Supreme Court Blocks New GOP Congressional Map in Missouri
- finance.yahoo.com — Genius Sports: Americans are Going to Keep Wagering
- jen.jiji.com — Agriculture: Ismea, deadline for applications to Inail Fund of 10 million for tractors extended to December 15
- www.law.com — ‘A Toss-Up?’: Manhattan Federal Court Weighs NY's Prediction Market Crackdown
- www.empirecenter.org — N.Y. fails education despite spending big
- theconversation.com — When a bet may not be gambling ‑ the puzzle of prediction markets
- www.miragenews.com — Prediction Markets: Betting or Not?
- markets.ft.com — Genius Sports: Americans are Going to Keep Wagering
-
Appeals Court Refuses to Stop Utah Gambling Crackdown on Kalshi
A federal appeals court declined to block Utah from enforcing its gambling law against prediction market Kalshi, leaving the central question of federal preemption unresolved. The decision comes as the U.S. Supreme Court monitors the situation regarding potential state regulation of prediction platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket. Meanwhile, prediction markets face various state-level pressures, including daily penalties in Michigan for lacking a geofence on sports event contracts. New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport has petitioned the Supreme Court to resolve a circuit split over whether these event contracts qualify as gambling or financial swaps.
Why it matters
The legal conflict tests the boundaries of state versus federal authority over prediction markets and event contracts. State regulators and officials seek to enforce local gambling laws against platforms operating across state lines, while operators maintain their activities fall under federal jurisdiction. This division has created a complex web of conflicting state restrictions and court actions as the Supreme Court watches the dispute.
What is confirmed
- A federal appeals court declined to block Utah from enforcing its gambling law against Kalshi.
- The core legal fight over federal preemption remains unresolved following the appeals court decision.
Still unconfirmed
- Polymarket and Kalshi face possible regulation as the Supreme Court monitors the situation.
What to watch next
- Supreme Court action on New Jersey's petition to resolve the circuit split
- Resolution of the federal preemption legal fight between states and prediction markets
confidence 100%Sources used for this update (6)
- mashable.com — Polymarket and Kalshi face possible regulation as Supreme Court 'monitors the situation'
- www.yahoo.com — Election Integrity Hysteria Betrays Weakness
- www.yahoo.com — Idaho election officials worry about mail-in ballot changes proposed by Trump administration
- www.law.com — Election Disputes Descend on Supreme Court Ahead of Midterms
- utahpolitics.news — Federal appeals court won't pause Utah's gambling crackdown on Kalshi
- jen.jiji.com — Women's tennis in financial crisis, WTA circuit risks bankruptcy
-
Supreme Court Weighs Future of Prediction Markets and Betting Control
The future of state versus federal control over sports betting is facing a high-stakes test at the U.S. Supreme Court as prediction markets battle state regulations. This legal conflict centers on whether event contracts qualify as gambling or financial swaps. Meanwhile, prediction market Kalshi faces daily penalties in Michigan for lacking a geofence on sports event contracts while blocking users from wagering on New Jersey's legal challenge. New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport has petitioned the Supreme Court to resolve a circuit split on the issue.
Why it matters
Prediction platforms face mounting state-level pressure and financial penalties over sports event contracts while attempting to expand their footprint. The unfolding legal battle highlights a regulatory vacuum as states assert authority over betting markets against federal classifications. This federal-state friction draws broader attention to jurisdictional limits on digital financial contracts.
What is confirmed
- Prediction markets regulation is challenged at the U.S. Supreme Court, shaping the future of state versus federal control over sports betting.
Still unconfirmed
- Prediction market Kalshi faces $500,000 daily penalties in Michigan for failing to geofence sports event contracts.
What to watch next
- Supreme Court decisions resolving the circuit split over prediction contracts.
- Further state enforcement actions or penalties against prediction platforms.
confidence 80%Sources used for this update (7)
- www.yahoo.com — Judge says Trump's federal takeover of mail-in voting is unconstitutional and states cannot 'feasibly' comply with proposed rule in time for upcoming midterm elections
- www.yahoo.com — California has heat-safety rules for farmworkers, but enforcement waned | Opinion
- www.ibtimes.co.uk — 'Impeach Everyone Who Is Responsible': Expert Says Trump Order Outright Defies Supreme Court
- www.bursa.ro — The energy crisis, unsolved by the Bolojan Government
- en.cryptonomist.ch — Supreme Court Weighs Prediction Markets Regulation as States Clash With Kalshi
- www.igamingtoday.com — Brazil Creates Procedure to Recover More Than R$1 Billion in Funds Linked to Illegal Betting
- www.yahoo.com — Looming ballot deadline complicates GOP appeal of Missouri redistricting decision
-
Michigan threatens Kalshi with $500,000 daily fines over sports contracts
Prediction market Kalshi faces $500,000 daily penalties in Michigan for failing to geofence sports event contracts. The platform has blocked users from wagering on the outcome of New Jersey's legal challenge against it. This escalation occurs as New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport petitions the U.S. Supreme Court to resolve a circuit split over whether such contracts are gambling or swaps. While Michigan forces these contracts offline, other firms like STX are attempting to enter the U.S. prediction market using experience from Ontario iGaming.
Why it matters
States are fighting to ensure prediction markets follow the same taxes and regulations as licensed sportsbooks. New Jersey seeks a high court ruling to prevent platforms from evading state gambling laws. A federal appeals court split on preemption has created the current legal instability.
What is confirmed
- Michigan is imposing a $500,000 daily fine on Kalshi for failing to geofence sports event contracts.
- Kalshi has blocked wagering on the outcome of the New Jersey lawsuit.
- New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport filed a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to settle whether prediction markets must follow state gambling laws.
- Federal appeals courts are currently split on the issue of preemption regarding these contracts.
Still unconfirmed
- STX plans to use its Ontario iGaming experience to enter the U.S. prediction market business.
- Prediction market bets on Pennsylvania politics could lead to corruption.
What to watch next
- U.S. Supreme Court decision on whether to grant certiorari to New Jersey's petition
- Confirmation of whether Kalshi implements the required geofencing in Michigan
- Further state-level injunctions against prediction market sports contracts
confidence 90%Sources used for this update (6)
- thecurrencyanalytics.com — Kalshi Halts Betting on Its Supreme Court Fate Amid $500K Fine Threat from Michigan
- TribLIVE.com — Could prediction market bets on Pa. politics lead to corruption?
- www.covers.com — STX’s Springboard: Ontario iGaming Experience Fuels US Prediction Market Push
- cryptoslate.com — Kalshi faces $500,000 daily fines as Michigan forces sports event contracts offline
- www.financemagnates.com — Federal Courts Now Disagree on Kalshi’s Sports Contracts. New Jersey Wants the Supreme Court to Settle the Fight
- thecurrencyanalytics.com — New Jersey Seeks Supreme Court Review of Kalshi’s Controversial Sports Contracts
-
New Jersey petitions Supreme Court over Kalshi sports betting
New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to determine if prediction markets like Kalshi can offer sports betting nationwide without following state gambling laws. The petition follows a circuit split regarding whether these contracts are gambling or swaps. New Jersey seeks a ruling to prevent Kalshi from evading state regulations. Separately, Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway argues that prediction markets offering sports contracts should be subject to the same taxes and regulations as licensed sportsbooks.
Why it matters
A federal appeals court previously ruled that states can regulate prediction markets as gambling. This decision stopped Kalshi from operating election and sports trading in Nevada without a license. The current legal battle centers on whether federal commodities law preempts state oversight.
What is confirmed
- New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport asked the U.S. Supreme Court to decide if prediction markets can offer sports betting without complying with state gambling laws.
- A circuit split has left the legal status of the 22 billion dollar platform Kalshi unresolved.
Still unconfirmed
- Crypto exchange Gate launched a white-label builder for prediction markets via Gate DexBuilder.
What to watch next
- The U.S. Supreme Court decision on whether to grant certiorari to New Jersey's petition.
- Further state attorney general filings regarding the regulation of prediction markets.
- Court rulings on the specific classification of Kalshi contracts as swaps or gambling.
confidence 95%Sources used for this update (7)
- arstechnica.com — NJ urges SCOTUS to rule that Kalshi sports bets are gambling, not “swaps”
- www.lawcommentary.com — Supreme Court Asked to Decide Whether Kalshi Can Bypass State Sports Betting Laws
- njbia.org — NJ AG Asks US Supreme Court to Stop Kalshi from Evading State Gambling Laws
- startupfortune.com — Crypto Exchange Gate Launches a White-Label Builder for Prediction Markets
- startupfortune.com — New Jersey Asks the Supreme Court to Decide Kalshi's Sports Betting Fate
- www.nytimes.com — An insurance company bet on LSU to win big. Is it tied to Lane Kiffin’s bonus?
- finance.yahoo.com — Missouri AG: Prediction Markets Should Follow Same Rules as Sportsbooks
-
Federal appeals court rules states can regulate betting markets
A federal appeals court has ruled that states have the authority to regulate prediction markets as gambling, rejecting Kalshi's claim that federal commodities law preempts state oversight. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' unanimous decision prevents Kalshi from operating sports and election trading in Nevada without a state gambling license. This ruling characterizes prediction market contracts as gambling rather than swaps.
Why it matters
The decision has significant implications for the multibillion-dollar prediction market industry, which has been subject to competing interpretations of the law. The ruling may lead to a Supreme Court decision that could reshape the industry's outlook. States are seizing on the Nevada ruling to regulate prediction markets.
What is confirmed
- The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that states have the authority to regulate prediction markets as gambling.
- The ruling prevents Kalshi from operating sports and election trading in Nevada without a state gambling license.
- New Jersey has asked the US Supreme Court to review the decision and clarify the regulation of prediction markets.
- The prediction market industry is worth billions of dollars and is subject to competing interpretations of the law.
What to watch next
- The US Supreme Court's decision on whether to review the case
- The outcome of New Jersey's petition to the Supreme Court
- The impact of the ruling on the prediction market industry
confidence 100%Sources used for this update (9)
- www.baltimoresun.com — Conflicting court rulings deepen fight over how prediction markets are regulated
- www.covers.com — Other States Seize on Nevada’s Prediction Market Triumph
- sports.yahoo.com — Bill Simmons on Proxy Betting Foofaraw: 'Lesson Learned'
- www.usatoday.com — NJ wants Supreme Court to let states regulate prediction markets
- thecurrencyanalytics.com — New Jersey Urges Supreme Court to Clarify Regulation of Prediction Markets
- cdcgaming.com — New Jersey asks U.S. Supreme Court to decide who regulates prediction markets
- www.law.com — 'Profoundly Wrong': New Jersey Asks Supreme Court to Review Kalshi's Win Over State Gambling Rules
- finance.yahoo.com — New Jersey Seeks Supreme Court Review of Sports Prediction Market Case
- jerseyvindicator.org — New Jersey petitions Supreme Court to block Kalshi from sidestepping state gambling laws
-
Federal appeals court rules states can regulate betting markets
A federal appeals court has ruled that states have the authority to regulate prediction markets as gambling, rejecting Kalshi's claim that federal commodities law preempts state oversight. The unanimous decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals prevents Kalshi from operating sports and election trading in Nevada without a state gambling license. This ruling characterizes prediction market contracts as gambling rather than swaps.
Why it matters
The decision intensifies a legal dispute over whether prediction markets are financial products regulated by Washington or state-controlled gambling operations. This issue may ultimately be settled by the Supreme Court, as the ruling creates a circuit split with a previous decision by the 3rd Circuit. The case has implications for the regulation of prediction markets and sports betting in the United States.
What is confirmed
- The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found that Kalshi's sports contracts amount to sports betting, even though the company offers them through a federally regulated exchange.
- The appeals court held that sports event contracts are bets—and not 'swaps,' which fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission under the federal Commodity Exchange Act.
- A ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit allowing Nevada to regulate prediction markets like Kalshi creates a split with the 3rd Circuit.
Still unconfirmed
- Kalshi this week announced it had entered into a brand partnership with the Padres and three other of the 'most beloved teams'
What to watch next
- The Supreme Court's decision on whether to hear the case and settle the circuit split
- The impact of the ruling on Kalshi's operations and partnerships in other states
- The response from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission on the ruling and its implications for federal regulation
confidence 85%Sources used for this update (5)
- www.techspot.com — A federal court just ruled Kalshi's sports markets are basically sports betting
- newschannel9.com — Conflicting court rulings deepen fight over how prediction markets are regulated
- voiceofsandiego.org — Federal Court Rules Padres Partner Offers Illegal Gambling
- www.law.com — 9th Circuit Says Nevada Can Regulate Kalshi Contracts as Gambling, Creating Circuit Split
- www.americanbanker.com — Kalshi ruling favoring states tees up Supreme Court fight
-
Ninth Circuit rules Nevada can regulate Kalshi sports contracts as gambling
A federal appeals court ruled on August 28 that Nevada has the authority to regulate prediction markets as gambling. The unanimous decision rejects Kalshi's claim that federal commodities law preempts state oversight of its sports-event contracts. This ruling prevents the platform from operating sports and election trading in Nevada without a state gambling license. The court characterized these contracts as gambling rather than swaps, intensifying a legal dispute over whether prediction markets are financial products regulated by Washington or state-controlled gambling operations.
Why it matters
Prediction platforms typically seek licensing from a federal commodity regulator to avoid state gaming board oversight and gambling taxes. This decision creates a circuit split with a previous Third Circuit ruling. Such disagreement between federal courts often leads to a Supreme Court review.
What is confirmed
- A federal appeals court ruled on August 28 that states can regulate prediction markets as gambling.
- The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Kalshi's claim that federal law preempts Nevada's authority over sports contracts.
- The court's decision was unanimous.
- The ruling prevents Kalshi from restarting trading on sports and election events in Nevada without a state gambling license.
Still unconfirmed
- Prediction platforms avoid being taxed like gambling because they are licensed by a federal commodity regulator.
What to watch next
- Supreme Court decision on the circuit split between the Third and Ninth Circuits.
- Kalshi's application for a Nevada state gambling license.
confidence 100%Sources used for this update (6)
- en.bloomingbit.io — US Appeals Court Backs Nevada’s Authority to Regulate Kalshi Sports Contracts
- thecurrencyanalytics.com — Ninth Circuit Deal Blow to Kalshi’s CFTC Preemption Claim in Nevada Betting Dispute
- www.cnn.com — ‘This is an all-out war’: Inside the casino industry’s fight to stop prediction markets
- www.wqow.com — States can regulate prediction markets as gambling, federal appeals court rules
- www.tekedia.com — Appeals Court Rules Nevada Can Regulate Kalshi, Deepening Legal Fight Over Prediction Markets
- cryptonews.net — Kalshi ruling puts CFTC prediction rules at risk
-
9th Circuit Rules States Can Regulate Prediction Markets as Gambling
A 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel ruled that states have the authority to regulate prediction markets as gambling. The 3-0 decision prevents prediction market operator Kalshi from restarting trading on sporting and election events in Nevada without a state gambling license. The court rejected Kalshi's argument that its sports-related event contracts are "swaps," instead characterizing them as gambling under a different name. This ruling creates a circuit split with a previous Third Circuit decision, increasing the likelihood of a Supreme Court review.
Why it matters
Prediction markets allow users to bet on the outcome of future events. Kalshi attempted to bypass state oversight by classifying these bets as financial swaps rather than gambling. This legal distinction determines whether a platform must obtain state-level gaming licenses to operate.
What is confirmed
- The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that states can regulate prediction markets as gambling.
- A federal appeals court panel refused to let Kalshi restart trading on sports and election events in Nevada.
- The court ruled that sports-related event contracts are not swaps.
- The 3-0 ruling creates a circuit split with a Third Circuit decision from April.
- Kalshi must obtain a license from state gambling regulators to operate in Nevada.
What to watch next
- A petition for review or a final decision by the U.S. Supreme Court
- Further legal challenges from Kalshi against state gambling regulators
confidence 100%Sources used for this update (11)
- CNN — States can regulate prediction markets as gambling, federal appeals court rules
- Reuters — Kalshi cannot block Nevada oversight of prediction markets, US appeals court rules
- CNBC — U.S. appeals court rules against prediction markets, sets up likely fight at Supreme Court
- NBC Sports — Federal appeals court rules that states can regulate betting markets
- Ars Technica — Court rules Kalshi sports bets aren’t “swaps,” just gambling with a different name
- finance.yahoo.com — Ninth Circuit rules states can regulate prediction markets as gambling
- www.azfamily.com — Federal court deals win to states in fight to regulate prediction market platforms
- www.cnbc.com — U.S. appeals court rules against prediction markets, sets up likely fight at Supreme Court
- thecurrencyanalytics.com — Kalshi Faces Legal Chaos After Appeals Court Rules States Control Prediction Markets
- arstechnica.com — Court rules Kalshi sports bets aren’t “swaps,” just gambling with a different name
- www.newsday.com — Federal appeals court panel gives Nevada a win in its fight to regulate prediction market Kalshi