Live Feeds
● LIVE Updated 1h ago · 17 sources tracked

Public say Prince Harry and Meghan should pay for their own security

Public opposition remains strong regarding the use of British taxpayer funds to provide security for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle following their return to Britain. The couple resigned as working royals six years ago to move to California, but their current presence in the UK has renewed arguments over state-funded protection. While the couple has sought security, former royal staff and Prime Minister Andy Burnham have previously pushed back, with Burnham characterizing the security arrangements as a private matter.

RSS Source map (17)

What changed

Recent commentary from Jan Moir suggests the couple maintains a god complex and views their status as a means for personal gain.

Live updates

  1. Public debate continues over security funding for Harry and Meghan

    Public opposition remains strong regarding the use of British taxpayer funds to provide security for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle following their return to Britain. The couple resigned as working royals six years ago to move to California, but their current presence in the UK has renewed arguments over state-funded protection. While the couple has sought security, former royal staff and Prime Minister Andy Burnham have previously pushed back, with Burnham characterizing the security arrangements as a private matter.

    Why it matters

    The dispute centers on whether individuals who voluntarily relinquish royal duties should maintain state-funded safety. This tension reflects a broader public disagreement over the financial obligations of the monarchy toward non-working members.

    Still unconfirmed

    • Jan Moir claims Meghan Markle is considering how to monetize their status for profit.

    What to watch next

    • Official statements from the Home Office regarding current security status
    • Legal filings regarding security cost reimbursements
    Sources used for this update (7)
    1. jen.jiji.com — The body of Daniele Compatangelo returns to Italy, the funeral on September 3rd and the burial on the 5th in Sauze di Cesana for the journalist
    2. jen.jiji.com — The Atlantic, White House wants to reduce political exposure of war before midterms
    3. www.dailymail.com — Inside Dolly Parton's bitter family feud as secret deathbed conversations over $450M inheritance are revealed: Who gets what... and mysterious outsider holding the key
    4. inews.co.uk — I’ve started using plug-in solar panels – I’m on course to save £300 a year
    5. www.dailymail.com — JAN MOIR: Harry and Meghan remain imbued with a mutual god complex to deliver us from evil and make the world a better place... chiefly for themselves
    6. jen.jiji.com — USA, Trump publishes ranking of best presidents in history. And he is first
    7. jen.jiji.com — Spain, woman stabbed to death near Huelva: Italian partner arrested
    confidence 80%

  2. Duke and Duchess of Sussex return to UK amid security funding debate

    Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have returned to Britain six years after resigning as working royals and moving to California. Their arrival renews public debate over whether British taxpayers should fund their security. While the couple has previously sought protection, public sentiment remains largely opposed to using state funds for their safety. Prime Minister Andy Burnham previously described the security arrangements as a private matter, and former royal staff have dismissed the security requests.

    Why it matters

    The couple's move to California marked a formal break from royal duties. This transition created a legal and financial dispute over who bears the cost of their protection during UK visits.

    What is confirmed

    • Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have returned to Britain six years after they stood down as working royals and settled in California.

    Still unconfirmed

    • British taxpayers should not spend any money on the security of Harry and Meghan.
    • Prince Harry and Meghan are using the British public and do nothing for the country.

    What to watch next

    • Official confirmation of who is paying for the couple's security during this visit
    • Statements from the Home Office regarding current security protocols for the Sussexes
    Sources used for this update (7)
    1. jen.jiji.com — Vuelta a España, today fifth stage: schedule, route and where to watch it
    2. jen.jiji.com — Fuels, government sources: excise duty discount extended until September 5. A measure worth approximately 130 million euros
    3. www.express.co.uk — 'Prince Harry and Meghan are using the British public – they do nothing for this country'
    4. www.yahoo.com — British taxpayers shouldn’t have to spend a penny on Harry and Meghan’s security
    5. inews.co.uk — Prince Harry and Meghan ‘arrive back in the UK’
    6. inews.co.uk — Instagram and Facebook to be made safer for children in the US…but not the UK
    7. inews.co.uk — Young people with anxiety and ADHD to be offered taxpayer-funded jobs at Boots
    confidence 90%

  3. Public Oppose Taxpayer-Funded Security for Prince Harry and Meghan

    British citizens largely oppose using public funds to provide security for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. While some support the couple's bid for protection, polls indicate a backlash against taxpayer funding. Prince Harry has privately sought answers regarding security from Mahmood, and a former Royal Family employee has dismissed his security requests as nonsense. Prime Minister Andy Burnham has characterized the couple's security arrangements as a private matter.

    Why it matters

    The dispute centers on whether the UK government should bear the cost of protecting the couple during their visits or return to the UK. This conflict highlights the tension between the couple's perceived security risks and public sentiment regarding their financial independence from the crown.

    Still unconfirmed

    • Prince Harry privately pleaded with Mahmood for security answers.
    • A former Royal Family employee described Prince Harry's security requests as absolute nonsense.
    • Meghan Markle has formed a friendship with Geri Horner ahead of a UK return.
    • The couple's security problem is linked to gun-control issues.
    • Prince Harry has a 3 million dollar security problem that may fall to UK taxpayers.

    What to watch next

    • Official government decision on the funding of the couple's UK security.
    • Confirmation of the couple's return date to the United Kingdom.
    • Further polling data on public opinion regarding Royal security funding.
    Sources used for this update (13)
    1. The Telegraph — Harry pleads privately with Mahmood for answers on security
    2. Reason Magazine — Harry and Meghan's Security Problem Is Really a Gun-Control Problem
    3. The Daily Beast — Damning Poll Shows British Backlash Against Taxpayer-Funded Security for Prince Harry
    4. consent.yahoo.com — Everything We Know About Harry And Meghan's Return To The U.K. (So Far)
    5. The Times — Public want Prince William and Prince Harry to reconcile
    6. Daily Express — 'I used to work for Royal Family - Prince Harry's security requests are absolute nonsense'
    7. The Spectator — Who should pay for Meghan and Harry’s security?
    8. Paula Froelich: Uncensored — The Semi-Daily BS: Harry's $3 Million Problem Is About to Become the UK Taxpayers’ Problems
    9. Yahoo — Prince Harry & Meghan Markle Get Fresh Support for UK Security Bid
    10. findoutnow — Royals polling for Mail on Sunday
    11. www.aol.com — Prince Harry and Meghan should pay for their own security needs, public says
    12. jen.jiji.com — Accidents, hit by a motorcycle: 4-year-old girl dies in the L'Aquila area
    confidence 60%